I loved this film. I even bought the DVD. I thought it was a brilliant documentary and that its presentation of the facts was spot on.
Are we homicidal in nature?
It named possible factors that could cause this… mass media, the president, history, etc, but Moore never really arrived into a conclusion. With regard to the question raised by Mauser?
The fact of the matter is: But I would like to assume that it is their culture that heavily influences people in the U.
After all, it is really hard to ignore the role of culture. This culture is cumulative of so many factors, and influenced by so many factors. There are so many of these I am sure the documentary failed to name all of them. For that, I have become interested in patching up the ideas in the film to make a broad framework that can help explain what influences rather than cause violent behavior: Though these three factors interplay with each other, what I would like to give emphasis here is that the behavior of a person is heavily influenced by the culture in which he is in, and this culture is heavily influenced by the institutions around the people.
Behavior refers to the actions or reactions of an object or organism, usually in relation to the environment Wikipedia In the film, the focus is on violent behavior.
It featured moments of violence in the US, and have named some factors that possibly cause and influence violent behavior of the Americans.
As the film suggests, those examples of behavior are highly influenced by the culture where Americans are in. As defined by Williamsculture consists of patterns, explicit and implicit, of and for behavior acquired and transmitted by symbols, constituting the distinctive achievement of human groups, including their embodiments in artifacts, the essential core of culture consists of traditional i.
From this definition, we find out that culture and behavior action actually have a mutual relationship, but what I want to emphasize here is the influence of culture on behavior.
Many Americans identify with this kind of culture and some of them may even act behave in accordance to this. And how does one react to this kind of culture? The film suggests that some of these institutions actually benefit from fanning this culture of fear and violence. Some of these institutions are the government, some corporations, the mass media, the school, the family, and the constitution.
These institutions may also directly affect the behavior of the people as opposed to influencing the culture, and letting the culture influence behavior. According to Marsh and Stokerseemingly neutral rules and structures actually embody values and determine appropriate behavior within given settings.
Through the process of socialization, these people adapt with the ways of these institutions, or adapt with the culture that these institutions influence.
In the film, the American government was portrayed as a violence-and-war-loving body. The American constitution also provides a basis for American people to bear arms.
The second amendment of their Bill of Rights states that: I think their constitution allowed a tradition of carrying weapons, which in turn fans their negative culture. The school was also pointed to be one of the bad influences of Eric Dylan and Harris Klebold, the young killers in the Columbine massacre.
The broken family was also pointed to be a factor that causes violence, where parents are not there to guide their children.
This specific case, as shown in the movie, was caused by other contributing factors: But the institution that I think was most emphasized for fanning this culture is the mass media. For example, in the news, while crimes in America were falling in reality, the crimes shown in the news were rising.
There were scares about the Y2K millennium bugthe Africanized bees, and the blade in the apple at Halloween, but none of them really happened.I first saw Bowling For Columbine (a documentary by Michael Moore about gun violence in America and the Columbine High School Massacre) in a Film Studies lesson when I was a naive fourteen.
Oct 24, · How has Michael Moore used film techniques to achieve an engaging documentary feature in "Bowling for Columbine"?
We have to write an essay on that question and The question pretty much says it all but im not quite sure how and what film techniques he used!Status: Resolved.
The Persuasive Techniques Used "In Bowling for Columbine". Words Sep 3rd, 9 Pages The movie "Bowling for Columbine" was made after the shooting in Columbine high school and tries to explore the reasons for America's violent nature. Bowling for Columbine Essay Sample.
Bowling for Columbine is a documentary that raises many social issues that are related to the gun problems in the United States Of America some of these issues include the, miss use of guns like the school shooting in columbine, the fear that the news and social media puts upon the Samaritans of America, consumerism the media bombards the people with fear.
Home Bowling for columbine quotes Bowling for columbine quotes. Bowling for columbine quotes.
Share on Facebook. Tweet on Twitter in humans intellectual property management plan example benefits of working from home key stage 1 maths persuasive techniques in speeches algebra 1 practice workbook answer key speech review example unc. Michael Jackson And The Jackson - Later on, Michael Jackson became a solo artist and grew separately from the Jackson 5.
Whenever someone refers to the “The King of Pop”, everyone automatically knows for a fact that they are talking about Michael Jackson.